Creating, Maintaining, Reusing

Border Commissions as the Key for Understanding Contemporary Borders - CREMARE

Creating, Maintaining, Reusing

Code: J6-2574 SICRIS

Sponsor: Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije (ARRS)

Web pagehttps://cremare.inz.si/

Period: September 1, 2020 - August 31, 2024

Head: dr. Marko Zajc

 

Partners and researchers involved:

 

 

About the Project

All borders are historical. The history of any border is not merely an underlying story, but is ingrained in its very structure. The way in which it has been constructed and maintained (why, how, when, where, and who has created it) contributes to the characteristics of contemporary borders. The border commissions that have created and/or maintained a specific border are of vital importance for its detailed understanding. It is not possible to understand the current borders without knowing the work of the border commissions. The repeated strengthening of the borders is one of the greatest challenges in contemporary Europe (securitisation of migrations, border fences, Brexit). If before 2015 the borders within the EU were seen as an anachronism, the 2015 Refugee crisis showed that the specific characteristics of the individual borders were exceedingly important. Only the knowledge of the complex heritage of individual borders allows for a successful and humane management of state borders. Border commissions are a legal tool for political entities to settle their mutual borders on an equal basis. Commission members include officials and experts. Border commissions may also be implemented by the political entities that are not independent. Some border commissions also include the "third factor": the federal authority, representatives of superpowers, etc. It is difficult to define the difference between bilateral joint commissions and multilateral commissions. According to their function, commissions can be divided into the following: a) those that define the border; b) those that maintain the border. In terms of duration, we can divide them as follows: a) permanent (e.g. border commissions addressing border rivers); b) special, "ad hoc" (addressing particular issues/disputes).

 

Scientific Background:

“Back to the line” / borders as objects

The material and historical aspects of the borders are at the forefront of our research. As objects, borders constitute a part of dynamic border processes (Passi 2012).

“Borders last longer than states”

Political borders can outlive the states that created them. In this sense, borders are more persistent as states.

Phantom borders and administrative legacy

Phantom borders are the former political borders that keep structuring the modern world. Administrative legacy is closely connected to the development of the modern territorial state

Basic research questions (RQ) in the longue durée perspective: Creating borders, Maintaining borders, Reusing borders

 

Objectives:

Scientific objectives: A better understanding of the manner in which borders as objects can conserve the past and co-create space and time.

Social objectives: 1. The potential influence on the public: overcoming the nationalistic, anachronistic, and deterministic outlooks; a better understanding of the complex processes of boundaries. 2. The potential influence on the practice of border management in the Republic of Slovenia and the EU: the understanding of the legacy of the concrete borders is vital for the management of borders as objects.